JPA Daily Buzz - Edisi 65 2026

According to reports from Santa Cruz County and advocacy organisations, the county has recorded childhood cancer rates above the California average. Activists and researchers have also pointed to concerns surrounding long-term exposure to agricultural chemicals used in conventional farming. 2
One UCLA-linked public health analysis identified several pesticides correlated with higher childhood cancer risks when exposure occurred during pregnancy and early childhood. 2
Yes, Driscoll’s is frequently mentioned in these discussions because: 2
the company is headquartered in Watsonville, California; 2
it controls a major share of the U.S. berry market; and 2
many nearby farms are linked to its supply chain. 2
But this is where nuance becomes VERY important. At this point, there is NO direct scientific evidence proving that eating Driscoll’s berries causes cancer. That distinction matters. 2
Most of the concerns focus on: 2
environmental exposure; 2
pesticide drift near schools and homes; and 2
the long-term effects on farmworkers and surrounding communities. 2
In other words, this is more about how food is produced not proof that a box of supermarket strawberries directly causes disease. To be fair, Driscoll’s has repeatedly stated that its farming operations comply with U.S. regulatory standards and pesticide rules established by authorities such as the EPA and California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 2
Still, the bigger issue remains uncomfortable. Modern industrial agriculture depends heavily on pesticides to meet massive global food demand. 2
Berries? 2
They’re actually among the crops often discussed in pesticide residue conversations because they are delicate, highly perishable, and vulnerable to pests and fungi. 2
What struck me most about this story wasn’t fear. 2
It was awareness because many of us including me buy food based on habit, branding, convenience, and trust. 2
We rarely stop and ask, where did this come from? 2
How was it grown? 2
What chemicals were involved before it reached our fridge? 2
This issue also highlights something much bigger: The people most affected are often not consumers. They are farmworkers. Children living near agricultural zones. 3
Families exposed to pesticide drift over many years and that’s why this conversation has become increasingly emotional in California. Community activists in Pajaro Valley have spent years pushing for stricter pesticide controls near schools and residential areas. Some groups are calling for farming zones around schools to transition fully to organic agriculture. 3
At the same time, others argue that modern farming simply cannot meet global demand efficiently without pesticides. So the debate continues. 3
Personally? I’m not panicking. I’m not throwing away berries and I’m definitely not falling into conspiracy theories. But I am becoming more conscious. 3
After reading more about pesticide-heavy agriculture, I’ll probably start diversifying where I buy produce from especially berries. 3
Maybe more options from: New Zealand Australia Spain or organic-certified farms when possible. 3
Not because I suddenly believe every berry is dangerous but because being an informed consumer matters. 3
Honestly, tomorrow is Saturday. Most of us will probably head to the supermarket, pasar pagi, or grocery store at some point this weekend. 3
So maybe this is simply a reminder for all of us: ✔️ Wash produce properly; ✔️ Read labels and country of origin; ✔️ Don’t blindly trust viral posts; ✔️ But don’t ignore legitimate concerns either; and ✔️ Stay curious about the food we consume daily 3
Sometimes the most important conversations start with the ordinary things sitting quietly inside our fridge. 3
Dr. Diyana Hassim Head of Corporate Communications Public Service Department 3
Beberapa kumpulan aktivis, laporan media tempatan, dan penyelidik kesihatan awam telah membangkitkan kebimbangan tentang penggunaan racun perosak berhampiran sekolah, kawasan perumahan, dan komuniti pekerja ladang. 5
Menurut beberapa laporan, Santa Cruz County turut mencatat kadar kanser kanak-kanak yang lebih tinggi berbanding purata negeri California. 5
Ada juga kajian yang menunjukkan kemungkinan kaitan antara pendedahan jangka panjang terhadap bahan kimia pertanian tertentu dengan peningkatan risiko kesihatan kepada komuniti berhampiran. 5
Ya, jenama Driscoll’s sering disebut dalam perbincangan ini kerana: 5
syarikat itu berpangkalan di Watsonville, California; 5
ia merupakan antara pemain terbesar dalam industri beri di Amerika; dan 5
banyak ladang di kawasan tersebut berkait dengan rantaian bekalan mereka. 5
Tetapi di sinilah pentingnya kita memahami konteks sebenar. Setakat ini, TIADA bukti saintifik langsung yang membuktikan bahawa memakan buah beri Driscoll’s menyebabkan kanser. 5
Perbezaan itu sangat penting. 5
Kebanyakan kebimbangan dan kajian lebih tertumpu kepada: 5
pendedahan persekitaran; 5
kesan “pesticide drift” berhampiran sekolah dan rumah; serta 5
kesan jangka panjang terhadap pekerja ladang dan komuniti sekitar. 5
Maksudnya, isu ini lebih besar daripada sekadar “sebekas strawberi menyebabkan penyakit.” Ia sebenarnya membuka persoalan lebih besar tentang bagaimana makanan moden dihasilkan. 5
Apa yang paling membuat saya berfikir tentang isu ini bukanlah rasa takut. Tetapi kesedaran. Sebab kebanyakan daripada kita termasuk saya membeli makanan berdasarkan kebiasaan, jenama, kemudahan, dan rasa percaya. 5
Jarang kita berhenti dan bertanya dari mana makanan ini datang? Bagaimana ia ditanam? Berapa banyak bahan kimia digunakan sebelum sampai ke meja makan kita? Isu ini juga mengingatkan kita bahawa pihak yang paling terkesan selalunya bukan pengguna di pasar raya. 5
Tetapi: 5
pekerja ladang; 5
keluarga yang tinggal berhampiran kawasan pertanian; dan 5
kanak-kanak yang terdedah kepada racun perosak dalam tempoh yang lama. 5
Sebab itu isu ini menjadi sangat sensitif di California. 5
Komuniti dan aktivis di Pajaro Valley telah lama mendesak kawalan lebih ketat terhadap penggunaan racun perosak berhampiran sekolah dan kawasan kediaman. 5
Pada masa yang sama, ada juga pihak yang berhujah bahawa pertanian moden berskala besar sukar memenuhi permintaan dunia tanpa penggunaan racun perosak. Jadi perdebatan ini masih berterusan. 6
Secara peribadi? Saya tidak panik. Saya tidak terus membuang semua buah beri di rumah dan saya juga tidak mahu terjebak dalam teori konspirasi. 6
Tetapi saya rasa lebih sedar. Selepas membaca lebih lanjut tentang pertanian yang bergantung kepada penggunaan racun perosak secara intensif, saya mungkin akan mula mempelbagaikan sumber pembelian buah-buahan saya terutamanya beri. 6
Mungkin lebih banyak pilihan dari: New Zealand Australia Spain atau ladang organik jika ada pilihan. 6
Bukan sebab saya tiba-tiba percaya semua beri itu berbahaya. Tetapi sebab menjadi pengguna yang lebih peka itu penting dan kebetulan, esok hari Sabtu. 6
Mungkin ramai antara kita akan ke pasar raya, pasar pagi atau kedai runcit untuk membeli barang dapur hujung minggu nanti. 6
Jadi mungkin ini cuma peringatan kecil untuk kita semua: ✔️ Basuh buah dan sayur dengan betul; ✔️ Semak label dan negara asal produk; ✔️ Jangan terus percaya semua perkara viral; ✔️ Tetapi jangan abaikan isu kesihatan awam yang sah juga; dan ✔️ Sentiasa ambil tahu tentang apa yang kita makan setiap hari 6
Kadang-kadang, persoalan paling besar bermula daripada perkara paling biasa yang ada di dalam peti sejuk kita sendiri. 6
Dr. Diyana Hassim Ketua Komunikasi Korporat Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam 6

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTc1NDAy